Barnes Projects Logo

Barnes Projects

Critical Analysis: FAIR Integration with TLCTC

Overview

FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) provides a robust framework for quantifying information security risk but lacks a structured approach to threat categorization and struggles with modeling complex attack sequences. The TLCTC framework can enhance FAIR's capabilities by providing both precise threat categorization and a methodology for understanding attack sequences.

Current State Analysis

FAIR's Strengths

FAIR's Limitations

TLCTC's Complementary Capabilities

Enhanced Integration Framework

1. Risk Quantification Enhancements

Sequence Complexity Factor (SCF)

Compound Threat Multipliers (CTM)

Path Variance Analysis (PVA)

Control Effectiveness Matrices (CEM)

2. Implementation Framework

Threat Modeling Phase

  1. Use TLCTC to identify relevant threat clusters
  2. Map potential attack sequences
  3. Identify parallel threat executions
  4. Document control mappings

Risk Analysis Phase

  1. Apply SCF to base FAIR calculations
  2. Incorporate CTM for parallel threats
  3. Perform PVA for alternative paths
  4. Apply CEM for control effectiveness

Risk Reporting Phase

  1. Document primary attack sequences
  2. Map controls to threat clusters
  3. Calculate enhanced risk scores
  4. Prioritize mitigation strategies

Real-World Application Example

Using the Emotet attack sequence from the whitepaper:

#9 -> #7 -> #7 -> #4 -> (#1 + #7)

Enhanced FAIR Analysis

  1. Calculate base risk using traditional FAIR
  2. Apply SCF for 5-step sequence
  3. Apply CTM for parallel execution (#1 + #7)
  4. Consider alternative attack paths
  5. Evaluate control effectiveness across sequence

Benefits of Integration

1. More Accurate Risk Quantification

2. Improved Control Evaluation

3. Enhanced Communication

4. Better Resource Allocation

Conclusion

Integrating TLCTC with FAIR creates a more comprehensive risk analysis framework that combines precise threat categorization with sophisticated risk quantification. The enhanced methodology better reflects the reality of modern cyber attacks while maintaining FAIR's quantitative rigor.

Specific FAIR Enhancement Proposals

1. Sequence Complexity Factor (SCF)

Formula Concept:

SCF = Base_Risk * (1 + Σ(Sequence_Length + Parallel_Threats))

Example using Emotet sequence (#9 -> #7 -> #7 -> #4 -> (#1 + #7)):

  • Sequence_Length = 5
  • Parallel_Threats = 1 (from #1 + #7)
  • SCF would increase the base risk calculation to account for this complexity

2. Compound Threat Multipliers (CTM)

For parallel threats like (#1 + #7), introduce a multiplier:

CTM = 1 + (Number_of_Parallel_Threats * Synergy_Factor) Where Synergy_Factor = Success probability increase when threats are combined

Example:

  • Single threat #1 success probability: 0.3
  • Single threat #7 success probability: 0.4
  • Combined (#1 + #7) with CTM: (0.3 + 0.4) * (1 + (2 * 0.2)) = 0.84

3. Path Variance Analysis (PVA)

For multiple possible attack paths like Pegasus:

Total_Risk = Max_Path_Risk + (Σ Alternative_Path_Risks * Path_Weight_Factor)

Example using Pegasus campaigns:

  • Path 1: #9 -> #3 -> #7
  • Path 2: (#5 + #4) -> #3 -> #7
  • Path 3: (#1 + #5) -> #3 -> #7

Calculate risk for each path, then apply PVA to get total exposure.

4. Control Effectiveness Matrices (CEM)

Create a matrix showing control effectiveness against multiple threats:

Control_A effectiveness against: #9 (Social Engineering): 0.8 #3 (Exploiting Client): 0.6 #7 (Malware): 0.7 Combined Effectiveness = Min(0.8, 0.6, 0.7) * Sequence_Position_Factor

5. Real-World Application Example

Let's apply this to a Cobalt Strike attack path (#9 -> #3 -> #7 -> #1 -> #4):

  1. Calculate SCF:
    • Sequence_Length = 5
    • SCF = Base_Risk * (1 + 5/10) = Base_Risk * 1.5
  2. Apply CTM for any parallel threats
  3. Calculate PVA for alternative paths
  4. Apply CEM for control effectiveness

Final Risk Calculation:

Enhanced_FAIR_Risk = Base_FAIR_Risk * SCF * CTM * PVA * (1 - CEM)

PROJECT REFERENCE: Cyber Threat Clusters

EXTERNAL REFERENCE:FAIR Institute - FAIR Risk Management

No additional updates are scheduled at this time.